Tutorials

April 25, 2011

Portrait Lenses – Which one is the best??

best_portrait_lens

Portrait lenses, which one is best??

I get this question all the time, so I knew it was time to write up an article on portrait lenses. In this article I’ll go over depth of field as it relates to focal length, aperture, distance to the subject, and crop factor.  Why some glass is better than others, and for what reason?  What distance is optimal for portraits and at what focal lengths? Recommended Glass!   If this sounds interesting, keep reading…To start off this article on portrait lenses, I want to go over a few really important concepts as it relates to portraiture that you should know before purchasing a lens.

  • Distance to subject and perspective
  • Focal length and perspective
  • Distortion
  • Aperture
  • Sharpness
  • Bokeh
  • Cost
  • Image stabilization

The ideal distance to the subject gives us the correct perspective, which will insure the features are captured with the correct proportions the human eye expects to see.  That might sound confusing and I apologize, but It really is a pretty simple concept to grasp.  When photographing people you want to be at least 10 feet away ideally and even further for groups.  This distance might sound like a lot, but it really isn’t as it relates to perspective.

When using a wide angle lens up close for a head shot you will yield a very distorted look enlarging the nose and altering the perspective so much that the ears disappear.  Check out the image below of Chopper.  Although not a human you can clearly see the distorted effect that this Sigma 10-20mm lens has on my buddy.

Chopper-Sigma-10-20mm

Chopper – Canon Rebel XTI, Sigma 10-20mm @ 10mm, f/4 ISO 400, 1/800sec

His tongue is stretched and his nose and head are so ballooned he looks like the Tasmanian Devil from the cartoon!  A very cool effect mind you, but not particularly flattering for a Senior Portrait head shot or a tight family photo.  However, in the correct circumstances a wide angle lens can create amazing landscape style portraits like in the image below of Grand Central Station and our friends Michele and Anthony.

Wide-Angle-Portrait-Sample

Canon 5Dmark II, Canon 17-40 f/4 L @ 19mm, f/10, 1/8thsec, ISO 400

Why the wide angle lens “works” for the Grand Central Station image, and not the other is muti-fold, but basically it’s the distance to the subjects as it relates to the camera and lens.  Because I’m so far away in the Grand Central  Station portrait, the perspective is correct enough that the models are not distorted looking. The point being, distance matters so you have the correct perspective on your subject and there “features” appear in the correct proportions. This way your model in theory should look there best.  In other words the focal length of the lens has no effect on the perspective of the portrait, the distance controls perspective.  So that being said, Any focal length in theory can be good for portraits if used correctly ;)

Focal length also matters!!  In the image below I was using my 5D Mark II, and Canon EF 100–400 f/4-5.6 L IS lens at about 20 feet away.  I got down on my belly and zoomed in to 400mm. This high focal length allowed me to get a great head and shoulders photo with no perspective distortion.  This high focal length in relation to the subject to background also created an amazing fall foliage bokeh.  The only downside I can think of to using a lens like this is you will need some room between you and the model which can be tuff at times.  For more on how focal length relates to Aperture, and distance be sure to check out my Understanding Aperture Tutorial over Here >>

Allison - Canon EF 100-400 f/4-5.6 L IS

The ideal focal length varies depending on what your shooting. For example, knowing that 10-12 feet is a good distance, the focal length will need to change in order to get a tight head shoot vs a full body shot. I personally love using my Canon 70-200mm lens on my full frame 5D Mark II for baby and child portraits.  That 70-200mm focal length gives me enough range in my studio at ~10-12 feet to zoom in close for a killer face portrait, quickly adjust to about 135mm for a head and shoulder shot, then go out until I get a nice full body shot. This can all be done in about a second with this lens.  The downside of using a lens like this is it can get heavy after a bit, especially if your not used to it.  Strap on a 5D Mark II with a battery grip and you have one pretty heavy set-up.  It’s tuff for Michele, but she can do it.  Check out he pics of Layla below both taken with the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM lens at the same distance.

Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS @ 150mm

Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS @ 150mm

Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS @ 105mm

Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS @ 105mm

If I need to shoot a family I would prefer to use the 70-200 and move as far back as needed, but sometimes that is just not possible. So I would put the Canon 24-105 f/4 L IS lens on and adjust the focal length until I can fit the group nicely.
Be sure to go to the next page by clicking below on the page numbers:

 
 





8 Comments


  1. John

    Great article and thanks for sharing.


  2. Pincherio

    I’m surprised to see no lenses from Zeiss or Leica but I assume you didn’t try them. What about the Sigma 85/1.4? Another ‘classic’ portrait lens that comes well reviewed is the Samyang 85/1.4. Like the Sigma, it comes in various mounts to fit the major camera mounts. The biggest difference is that the Samyang is a manual lens, but output-wise, is as well regarded as the Nikon 85/1.4. Well maybe not as, but does come pretty close. And the best part about it is that it’s relatively affordable, at about 1/4 the price of the Sigma and way less than the Nikon. Are either of these lenses better than Canon’s 85/1.2L? I don’t know, but what I do know is that these lenses are better portrait lenses than some of the others you mentioned here. But that’s just me.


    • Jay

      Very good points you raise here Pincherio ;) You are correct I have not tried the Zeiss or Leica, but that is about to change in the next few months. I really appreciate you sharing your comments, feedback, and input!

      Jay


  3. One question..
    I had the theory that having the Canon 24-70 2.8 usm and The canon 70-200 f2.8 IS USM would be just about all I need for portraits and in the field…
    I am talking within my budget.. but I did not see the 24-70 in your review…
    Should I sell my 24-70 and get some thing else…
    I am here in Alaska.. and I am having to do most all my work in my living room studio…
    I have 2 Alien Bees B800s and a bk setup.
    Love to know what your thoughts are on the 24-70 for portraits and in the field.
    I found that the 70-200 that I use for everything is not all that great for some events.. like Horse Shows where the horses and riders get up close to where I am.. the 70-200 is just to narrow of a field of view.. so I got the 24-70. Thanks.. love to her your thoughts.


    • Jay

      AkFamilyPhoto,

      Thanks for your comments and questions :)

      The 24-70mm f/2.8 is a fantastic lens and is a great choice for Portraits in many situations. It also complements the 70-200mm perfectly.

      I did not include it in my review, because there are just two many great lenses to list, and I own the 24-105 f/4 L IS. I went with the 24-105mm f/4 L IS over the 24-70mm for the simple fact that I wanted more reach on my 5D Mark II.

      I’m not sure if your shooting with a Full Frame camera or not?

      On a full frame camera 70mm is just not enough for a lot of stuff the way I shoot, but 105mm is. f/4 is also not bad on the 5d Mark II Depth of Field wise, but it can be limiting in low light without a flash. For Portraits 90% of the time in low light I’m using a flash and the aperture is set to f/5.6 though so it really doesn’t matter. When I do low light work I switch to the 135mm f/2 or the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS. It’s usually detail work or natural light and I prefer to use the higher focal length lenses for these type of shots.

      The 24-105 f/4 L also makes a better walk around lens in my opinion because it has that extra reach. So if I can only take one lens it’s usually the 24-105 f/4 L IS.

      As far as selling your lens? That is a tuff call!! Do you use f/2.8 for your portraits a lot? If not, would you rather the convenience of an extra 35mm of zoom for that close-up? I personally do, but that is just me.

      Maybe try renting a lens or two and see if you like them? The lenses are such an investment as you know it’s a tuff choice and you really need to try them yourself I’ve learned.

      I hope this helps you out in some way or another ;)

      Best,
      Jay


      • Yeah, I noticed the extra reach.
        I am on a 60D, and will not have money to get anything better…
        I hear of so many other lenses.. sometimes I just get caught up in IF I JUST HAD THAT ONE MORE THING…

        I think really, now that I have been blessed enough to be able to own the 24-70, 70-200 and the cheapo 50mm.. that , OMG, I should be satisfied!
        Many would give their left toe to have the equipment I have and there I go.. looking at bigger and better all the time…

        Thanks for all you do.


        • Jay

          Yeah, with the 60D your pretty good with the 24-70 ;) A little tight on the wide end for my style of shooting, as I preferred to use the EF-S 17-55mm on my 40D. (use the 5D Mark II now) I like to shoot wide in churches and outside etc… Then I switch to the 70-200mm and get all those close-ups!!

          Best,
          Jay



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>